Ideally, rule 1.5 of the ABA Module of Rules of Professional Conduct normally prohibits lawyers from charging unreasonable fees and for that; it calls for ethical lawyer billing, this is to say that lawyers can only charge reasonable fees.
Affirmatively, the term ethics seems to have taken a new understanding in the 21st century since at times it becomes too hard to pick on some extreme behavior and claim it is proof of widespread unethical behavior among lawyers.
Nonetheless, different accounts of events tend to bring about the unethical practices among lawyers, for instance, unethical billing but the big problem is that these practices have been normalized to the point of been accepted as a normal practice among lawyers.
To this effect, understanding lawyer billing ethics is very crucial since it can save you a lot of money due to the fact that you will be able to point out unjustified billing.
Most importantly, ethics are driven by standards and standards by time, as time changes, standards change, and so do ethics.
Lawyer Billing Ethics
Ideally, when clients are informed by the lawyers that they will be billed on a time basis, that is basically a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct since imposing additional fees which was not disclosed on the prior agreement will be termed as abuse of the law practice.
Nonetheless, the proposed lawyer charges proposed during the agreement does not violate the Rules of Professional Conduct since the client is informed of the lawyer charges either on an hourly basis or on an inclusive basis thus agreeing on the various estimates presented by the lawyer.
Some of the Tips Towards Understanding Lawyer Billing Ethics include:
Be Keen with Details
First and foremost, the easiest way to avoid falling into the trap of unethical lawyers is to be very keen when it comes to details of the contract.
Many are the times that lawyers include hidden statements in the contract to entice their clients to sign the contract during their initial meeting that way been bond to the contract.
The truth of the matter is that, clients barely read the contract during their initial meeting since they are usually caught up by the case at hand, worrying on how things are going to take their course throughout the lawsuit, and for that they end up signing the contract even without getting the ‘nitty-gritty’ of the contract.
To this effect, lawyers take advantage of their clients by including statements such as charging per hour outside the contract among others, statements that they wouldn’t want to disclose to their clients that way ending up been legally bound by the contract.
To this effect, to ensure that you don’t end up in such a trap you need to go over the contract, word by word and where you don’t understand you seek more clarity from your lawyer.
The lawyer is required by law to explain the details of the contract to you even before you sign so as to ensure that you get into a contract that you are well conversant with. This way, the client will appreciate the lawyer’s efforts as well have very few questions concerning the invoices.
Again, be keen with the details can also be very helpful since by so doing, the client will be able to point out any unexplained figures in the invoice. In the same manner, this will also help the client pay only for the services rendered.
Understand that Each Case is Different
As a client, it’s important to note that all factors included in Module Rule 1.5 are not all exclusive; nor are they all apply to every case; however, other details of the Module Rule 1.5 might be in considerations depending on the details of a given case.
Just as stated in this text, cases are different and vary from one case to another.
Again, details of a case might change from time to time depending on the jurisdictions of the previous cases, and along these lines, it’s important to understand the details of your case even before you get into a contract with your lawyer.
Ideally, lawyers are expected to disclose the details of a given case to their clients with the aim of familiarizing themselves with the parameters of a given case.
In relation to this, the court as well the law holds that it is unreasonable for lawyers to charge their clients for the time spend while familiarizing their clients with substantive law related to the case.
Further, the law holds that it is unreasonable for lawyers to charge their own individual rates for services rendered to their clients by nonlawyers or even their own law-related tasks that normally constitute the practice of law such as sending emails, delivering documents among others.
To this end its rather apparent that understanding that each case is different will help you familiarize yourself with your case; that way been able to pay only for services rendered that way saving your money from been used on unnecessary activities.
Avoid Being Billed in Bocks
Ideally, what most lawyers do is billing their clients on large blocks; in other words, they try to breakdown the entire process into smaller blocks and that way charging on an hourly basis.
For instance, a lawyer may decide to breakdown one single task into two different tasks, but they entirely mean the same thing; instead of charging on responding to discovery demands, they break it into two that is; reviewing demands and reviewing file to locate responsive documents.
This is to mean, in this scenario, the lawyer will charge the client a double amount on what is supposed to be a single task. Instead of focusing on quality, the lawyers focus on the number of blocks.
Being able to identify similar tasks which are broken down into different tasks can be very helpful to a client as they will only pay for the quality of work and not quantity.
Conclusively, as stated in the text above, understanding lawyer billing ethics can help you save a lot of money which could have otherwise been spent n unjustified or rather unethical practices of your lawyer.
Lawyers must uphold good ethics as it will be good for business, clients will gain their trust and might end up offering some gratuity, and above all, it’s a good and most recommended practice.